Opinion: Counter-tariffs drove up cost of groceries in Canada

Article content material

It was anticipated, however nonetheless jarring. In April, meals inflation in Canada surged to three.8 per cent — a full 2.1 proportion factors above the nationwide inflation fee, and practically double the U.S. fee of two per cent.

Article content material

Article content material

As soon as once more, meals is the first driver behind Canada’s headline inflation, amplifying affordability considerations from coast to coast.

Behind that 3.8 per cent determine lie important will increase throughout key meals classes. Meat costs climbed 5.8 per cent 12 months over 12 months, with beef main the pack at a staggering 16.5 per cent. Egg costs rose 3.9 per cent, whereas recent fruit and vegetable costs elevated by 5 per cent and three.7 per cent, respectively.

Article content material

These aren’t anomalies. They replicate underlying price pressures exacerbated by current shifts in commerce coverage and provide chain technique.

Since March, when each Canada and the US applied a brand new spherical of tariffs, the divergence in outcomes has been putting. U.S. meals inflation has continued to chill, whereas Canada’s has practically tripled over the identical interval.

Tripled.

In two built-in economies, this rising disparity ought to elevate purple flags.

The foundation causes are more and more evident. Ottawa’s earlier determination to implement counter-tariffs disrupted long-standing North American procurement techniques.

In response, Canadian grocers started pivoting away from U.S. suppliers — notably in classes like recent produce and frozen meals — and turned to costlier or much less environment friendly alternate options. The outcomes at the moment are exhibiting up on the grocery invoice.

Article content material

Article content material

Luckily, that coverage course has modified. In line with a current report from Oxford Economics, Prime Minister Mark Carney quietly eradicated lots of the counter-tariffs that had been inflating meals prices. The choice, whereas politically delicate, was economically sound — and lengthy overdue.

Easing these restrictions is already starting to alleviate stress alongside the provision chain. Over time, this might assist stabilize and even sluggish meals value development.

However broader context issues. Amongst G7 nations, Canada now has the second-highest meals inflation fee — behind solely Japan. Meals value will increase in France, Germany, Italy, the UK and the US stay effectively beneath Canada’s.

That begs the query: Why is meals costlier in Canada than in virtually each different superior economic system?

The reply is not only worldwide volatility or local weather shocks. It’s additionally about home selections. Tariffs, protectionist procurement practices, and structurally restricted commerce flexibility have created a uniquely Canadian inflation narrative — one pushed extra by inner coverage than by exterior pressures.

Article content material

And Canada’s geoeconomic leverage merely doesn’t evaluate to that of the US. Not even shut. That’s why Carney’s reversal on food-related tariffs represents a possibility — to reset coverage priorities and undertake a extra pragmatic, much less performative strategy to affordability.

Canadians ought to welcome this shift. However in addition they deserve transparency. Meals inflation can’t be solely blamed on world disruptions or seasonal cycles. It’s time we acknowledged how a lot of it’s homegrown.

Transferring ahead, federal and provincial governments should co-ordinate extra successfully, talk with higher readability, and be sure that entry to reasonably priced, nutritious meals stays a nationwide precedence.

In fact, there’s nothing inherently fallacious with patriotic consumerism. However “maplewashing” — the advertising and marketing of imported items underneath deceptive “Canadian” banners — is deceptive and dangers undermining public belief. Worse, it could actually distort markets and push costs even increased. Grocers shouldn’t abuse.

Article content material

As for Ottawa, symbols like “Elbows Up” and “Canada’s Not For Sale” could have mobilized assist throughout a unstable political second, however they need to by no means substitute for sound financial governance. Rhetoric can solely go to date — and, in some circumstances, it blinds policymakers to the very penalties of their actions.

Canada’s meals inflation story didn’t should unfold this fashion. Now that we’ve a possibility to appropriate course, let’s not waste it.

Sylvain Charlebois is the director of the Agri-Meals Analytics Lab at Dalhousie College and co-host of The Meals Professor Podcast.

Our web sites are your vacation spot for up-to-the-minute Saskatchewan information, so ensure to bookmark thestarphoenix.com and leaderpost.com. For Regina Chief-Put up newsletters click on here; for Saskatoon StarPhoenix newsletters click on right here

Article content material