Trump admin stops grant funding for school mental health : NPR

The U.S. Division of Training is telling impacted districts that the Biden administration, in awarding the grants, violated “the letter or purpose of Federal civil rights law.”

Jim Watson/AFP by way of Getty Photos

cover caption

toggle caption

Jim Watson/AFP by way of Getty Photos

The Trump administration says it is going to cease paying out $1 billion in federal grants that faculty districts throughout the nation have been utilizing to rent psychological well being professionals, together with counselors and social staff.

The U.S. Division of Training is telling impacted districts that the Biden administration, in awarding the grants, violated “the letter or purpose of Federal civil rights law.”

The grants have been a part of the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act — a invoice handed within the aftermath of the college taking pictures in Uvalde, Texas, during which a teen gunman killed 19 elementary faculty college students and two adults and injured 17 individuals. The invoice, amongst different issues, poured federal {dollars} into colleges to deal with rising issues a few student mental health crisis.

These {dollars} helped Superintendent Derek Fialkiewicz in Corbett, Ore., greater than triple the variety of faculty psychological well being professionals in his largely rural district of 1,100 college students east of Portland. Earlier than the grants, Fialkiewicz says his district had simply two counselors, “and we realized, that’s just not sustainable for our students and especially coming out of COVID.”

In early 2023, due to the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, the district acquired a federal grant that totally lined the salaries and advantages of 5 new educated social staff.

“It’s been amazing,” says Fialkiewicz of the distinction that federal cash — and the social staff it paid for — have made in his faculty group.

He says he was shocked when he heard the Trump administration was placing an finish to this federal help. Simply Tuesday, a U.S. Division of Training worker who oversees their grant had given his district the go-ahead so as to add a telehealth texting service for college kids. An hour later, Fialkiewicz says, he bought an electronic mail that the grant can be discontinued.

Republicans supported these psychological well being grants

The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, and the psychological well being funding that accompanied it, loved appreciable Republican help even within the years after it handed.

“Too often, adolescents with untreated mental health conditions become the very same perpetrators who commit acts of violence,” wrote three of the regulation’s Republican supporters — Sens. John Cornyn of Texas, Susan Collins of Maine and Thom Tillis of North Carolina — in a 2024 opinion piece. “For this reason, we crafted our law to ensure teachers and administrators are equipped with the tools to recognize when a student is experiencing a mental health crisis and, more importantly, connect them with the care they need before it’s too late.”

The endgame was “to prepare and place 14,000 mental health professionals in schools,” says Mary Wall, who oversaw Ok-12 coverage and price range for the U.S. Division of Training through the Biden administration.

Wall says about 260 faculty districts in almost each state acquired a portion of the $1 billion — within the type of five-year grants, which have been paid out in installments.

Now, it seems these districts should discover a approach to do with out the cash that they had deliberate for however won’t obtain.

“The preparation of new mental health professionals, as well as those who are already in service, is at risk,” Wall says.

In Corbett, Fialkiewicz says he is been instructed his grant cash, which was speculated to final till December of 2027, will as a substitute cease this December, two years early. As soon as it does, he says, “We’re gonna end up going back to having two counselors in our district.”

The superintendent says he feels “disgusted” by the thought of getting to put off these federally funded social staff.

“To be able to provide those [mental health] services and then have it ripped away for something that is completely out of our control, it’s horrible,” Fialkiewicz says. “I feel for our students more than anything because they’re not gonna get the services that they need.”

An August 2024 poll from the American Psychiatric Affiliation discovered that “84% of Americans believe school staff play a crucial role in identifying signs of mental health issues in students.”

Why the division says it reduce the grants 

In a press release to NPR, Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications on the Division of Training, defined the choice to discontinue the grants:

“Recipients used the funding to implement race-based actions like recruiting quotas in ways that have nothing to do with mental health and could hurt the very students the grants are supposed to help. We owe it to American families to ensure that tax-payer dollars are supporting evidence-based practices that are truly focused on improving students’ mental health.”

However the 2022 federal grant notice instructed colleges explicitly: The companies to be supplied should be “evidence-based.”

Wall additionally disputes the division’s characterization, telling NPR that “the focus of these grants was absolutely on providing evidence-based mental health support to students. Any suggestion that this is a DEI program is a distraction from the real issue.”

The Trump administration and the Training Division have been making use of a brand new interpretation of federal civil rights regulation to a variety of federal packages. Final month, the division threatened to revoke Ok-12 colleges’ federal funding if they do not cease all DEI programming and instructing that the division would possibly take into account discriminatory.

In response to a request from NPR to additional clarify why the division believes these psychological well being grants had by some means run afoul of Trump’s anti-DEI coverage, it supplied a number of transient excerpts from districts’ grant purposes, during which one grantee wrote that faculty counselors should be educated “to recognize and challenge systemic injustices, antiracism, and the pervasiveness of white supremacy to ethically support diverse communities.”

The preliminary federal request for grant purposes prompt districts prioritize “increasing the number of school-based mental health services providers in high-need [districts], increasing the number of services providers from diverse backgrounds or from the communities they serve, and ensuring that all services providers are trained in inclusive practices.”

Within the electronic mail Fialkiewicz acquired, notifying him of the grant’s finish, the division wrote that the efforts funded by the grant violate federal civil rights regulation, “conflict with the Department’s policy of prioritizing merit, fairness, and excellence in education; undermine the well-being of the students these programs are intended to help; or constitute an inappropriate use of federal funds.”

When requested if range performed any function in his district’s grant utility, Fialkiewicz replied:

“Yes, in our application, we did state, because it was part of the requirements, that we would use equitable hiring practices. And that’s exactly what we did. And to me, equitable hiring practices means you hire the best person for the job. That’s equitable.”

And now, these social staff he employed would possibly lose their jobs.